|
Scientific Advisory Board
2003 OCS Scientific Committee Meeting Summary
April 22-24, 2003
The OCS SC of the Minerals Management Advisory Board held its annual
meeting on April 22-24, 2003, in Anchorage, Alaska. On Wednesday, April
22, the SC was briefed by Mr. Robert LaBelle, Deputy Associate Director
for Offshore Energy and Minerals Management, in which he provided the SC with a
historical review of the OCS program. Mr. John Goll, Director of the
Alaska OCS Region, provided an overview of ongoing and planned activity in
Alaska and Dr. James Kendall Chief, Environmental Sciences Branch,
presented an overview of the Environmental Studies Program (ESP). The SC
also heard reports and updates on the OCS Policy Committee, the Mercury
Subcommittee, the Alaska and Louisiana Coastal Marine Institutes (CMI),
and regional priorities and information needs.
Mr. LaBelle stated that:
 |
the Minerals Management Service (MMS) manages 1.76 billion acres of
submerged lands,
|
 |
the OCS Lands Act celebrates its 50th Anniversary,
|
 |
this year’s Safety in Seas Award was presented to Chevron Texaco,
|
 |
production from the 40 million OCS acres under lease accounts for
about 30 percent of all domestic crude oil production and about 25
percent of all domestic natural gas production,
|
 |
the MMS has collected over $80 billion in revenue generated by over
66 lease sales, 8.6 billion barrels of oil, and 90 trillion cubic feet
of natural gas,
|
 |
in 2002, 12 new deepwater discoveries were made - three of these
were in 8,000 feet or greater water depth and 14 new deepwater projects
began production, and
|
 |
MMS is working with the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration which is responsible for implementing the Marine Mammal
Protection Act which protects the marine mammals existing in areas where
oil and gas activities are being conducted. |
Mr. Goll:
 |
Congratulated Dr. Fred King on his being awarded the Federal
Executive Association Award, which is very stiff competition and was
awarded for the work he devoted to MMS’s National Environmental Policy
Act documents, the Environmental Impact Statements, and other management
issues that the Alaska OCS Region has encountered,
|
 |
announced that within MMS’s leasing schedule for the next 5 years,
four offshore areas are being offered for sale in September, 2003 and
include the Beaufort Sea, Cook Inlet, the Chukchi Sea/Hope Basin, and
Norton Basin areas,
|
 |
described Northstar as being in operation for 1 year and nominally
has produced about 60,000 barrels – 84 percent State and 16 percent
Federal,
|
 |
stated that the McCovey Project in the Central Beaufort Sea had been
a project of high interest during this past winter and that Phillips,
with Chevron, used a Steel Drilling Caisson, which is a tanker converted
to an ice-strengthened drilling vessel, to drill and, in February, the
well was plugged and abandoned,
|
 |
stated that in Cook Inlet, the MMS is involved in the Cosmopolitan
Unit that was drilled from onshore into state waters but includes two
federal OCS leases, and
|
 |
reported challenges in Alaska that include oil spills and cleanup in
broken ice, bowhead whale and subsistence, subsistence in general,
activity avoidance, sociological effects, impact assistance,
environmental justice, lack of seismic vessels, and lack of drilling
vessels. |
Dr. Kendall:
 |
Reported that for Fiscal Year 2004, the ESP budget would probably
remain around $17 million,
|
 |
explained the ESP and peer review processes, and
|
 |
explained that the ESP had been subject to the President’s Budget
and Performance Integration Initiative. |
Dr. Larry Schmidt reported that the OCS Policy Committee met in
November 2002 in New Orleans, Louisiana, and topics addressed were: global
energy; methane hydrates; Oil in the Sea; Energy, the Environment and
Public Opinion; Mercury Studies; and Legislative issues and regional
updates. At its next meeting on May 13-14, 2003, in Alexandria, Virginia,
the Committee will consider a resolution regarding long-term management of
geo-science data.
Dr. William Schroeder stated the Mercury Subcommittee was formed in
March after the Mobile Register began a series of articles on mercury
based on analysis of mercury and fish and then mercury and humans and
immediately began to try to assign blame on the oil and gas industry and
the use of barium in drilling muds for lubrication during exploration. It
produced a report, Mercury in the Gulf of Mexico: The Role of Outer
Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Activities, which the SC voted to accept.
Dr. Kendall presented background information on the CMI, which was
started in 1989, and stated its goals are to strengthen relationships with
States where OCS oil and gas activities take place, facilitate a
cost-sharing partnership, address MMS and State information needs, improve
information flow to local communities and the State, and provide for a way
of training new students in oil and gas issues. He also stated that:
 |
The participants of the CMI are Louisiana State University,
University of California at Santa Barbara, and the University of Alaska
Fairbanks,
|
 |
the Universities submit Letters of Intent (LOI) and, after review,
full proposals are requested for those selected, and
|
 |
the Gulf of Mexico CMI has 91 completed or ongoing projects at a
cost of $21.4 million; the Alaska CMI has 44 completed or ongoing
projects at a cost of $13.5 million; and in California, there are 36
projects ongoing or completed at a cost of $6.4 million. |
Dr. Vera Alexander gave a
presentation on the Alaska CMI:
 |
The MMS provides $1 million annually to be matched one-for-one with
non-federal dollars. Current project expenditures include $2,173,841 in
physical oceanography; $1,320,950 in biology; $268,171 in chemical; and
$125,168 for administrative costs,
|
 |
most of the research currently being conducted is in the Beaufort
Sea since that is where most of the offshore oil development activity is
taking place; other areas include Cook Inlet area, the Chukchi Sea, and
several other projects that are less field oriented are based in
Fairbanks, and
|
 |
research topics include seabird habitat, ocean circulation, whale
migration, sediment chemistry, sea ice, and hydrocarbon degradation.
|
Dr. Larry Rouse gave a presentation
on the Louisiana CMI:
 |
For the first Cooperative Agreement, there were 62 projects funded
and the second one has had 37 projects funded for a total of about $17
million worth of research,
|
 |
studies being conducted range from the social sciences, sociology
and economics, to biological and physical processes,
|
 |
research is being done on platform ecology and one particularly
interesting study is the interaction between migrating birds and the
offshore oil and gas platforms, |
 |
there have been several studies on the interaction between
recreational and commercial fisheries with oil and gas platforms,
|
 |
the State of Louisiana has a very significant land loss problem and
one of the ways to revamp at least the barrier islands is to mine
offshore sand, and
|
 |
this year 29 LOIs were submitted through the CMI and full proposals
were requested for 11 of these while two others were encouraged to
submit proposals that would be passed on to other sections of MMS. |
Tuesday’s afternoon session was devoted to reports on regional
priorities and information needs. Mr. Barry Drucker presented for
the Sand and Gravel Program followed by comments from Dr. Robert Diaz and
Mr. Schmidt. Dr. Cleve Cowles presented for the Alaska OCS Region, Dr.
Fred Piltz for the Pacific OCS Region, and Dr. Pat Roscigno for the Gulf
of Mexico OCS Region.
Wednesday was devoted to discipline-based breakout sessions
(Ecology/Biology/ Physical Oceanography, and Socioeconomics) where each
discipline-based breakout group met separately with staff members from
each Region and Headquarters. In each breakout session, one SC member was
designated as a discussion leader and an MMS staff member was assigned to
take notes. On Thursday, the leaders identified regional priorities for
future environmental studies.
On Thursday, the SC heard a series of presentations from the Ninth
Alaska Information Transfer Meeting which had been held in Anchorage, on
March 10-12, 2003, and hosted 38 technical presentations of various
disciplines. The second Information Update Meeting was held in Barrow,
Alaska, on March 14, 2003, and one of the topics discussed was the concern
over the Arctic Cisco and other Arctic fish in the Holgate River Drain.
Both meetings were oriented to provide public dissemination of results and
investigators were given the opportunity to discuss the program, its
planning, and its activities.
The SC received an update on the progress of the U.S. Commission on
Ocean Policy, presented by Mr. Edward Rasmuson, a member of the
Commission. As the Commission moves toward completing its mandate during
2003, a number of recommendations are beginning to take shape and be
discussed openly. Mr. Rasmuson presented the draft recommendations which
will be submitted for Governors review in August.
During the business session of the meeting, the SC developed the
following recommendations and acknowledgments to the Director of MMS:
 |
The SC unanimously expressed its overall high regard for the
personnel and programs of headquarters and the regions.
|
 |
The SC reiterated the importance of several issues raised last year
and continue to recommend that all regions keep up-to-date with
appropriate literature, including recent publications related to
moratorium areas.
|
 |
Data and knowledge obtained through MMS efforts are valuable
resources for current and future studies, both internal and external to
MMS. To insure public accessibility of MMS-sponsored information, a
comprehensive plan for archiving and accessing should be developed. An
expert on database development and use should address the next SC meeting
on strategies for structuring and accessing large diverse databases.
|
 |
Given the common missions of the regions and similarity of many
current studies and proposed study profiles, it is important that the
regions closely coordinate future studies to maximize applicability of
products. A high level of coordination would also prevent unnecessary
duplication of effort and maximize information gain for available
resources.
|
 |
The SC recognizes MMS’s long-standing, uninterrupted archiving
program with the Smithsonian Institution and encourages its continuation.
Additionally, it recommends that MMS expedite discussions with the
Smithsonian regarding the development of its Web Accessible System for
querying such archived materials. The application of such new technologies
to archived material would add a new dimension to MMS studies on par with
an archival database. Museum collections are also essential to documenting
and understanding biodiversity, a major international priority.
|
 |
Given the recent national emergence of programs to bring science into
the classroom, MMS should investigate additional ways of turning its
research products into educational and outreach materials. The SC is aware
of the efforts underway by all of the MMS OCS Regions and recommends that
these continue. Additionally, the recent education packages developed by
the Pacific OCS Region should be used as models by the other OCS Regional
Offices.
|
 |
CMI's should highlight student participation in projects and programs
by providing citations for all theses and dissertations or other student
products on their respective Websites. It would also be relevant to
include information on current student projects.
|
 |
MMS should continually monitor the environmental data it collects, as
well as advances in sampling technology and data analysis, in order to
continuously refine procedures for assigning (or modifying) appropriate
distances of separation between OCS activities and resources designated
for protection.
|
 |
Decommissioning will likely become a major focus of MMS interest and
research. In preparation for an expected research initiative, relevant
literature should be summarized and the Western and Gulf of Mexico Regions
should determine areas of commonality in order to avoid duplicative
research programs. |
 |
The rise of Marine Protected Areas (MPA) as a management strategy
necessitates that MMS start to consider the relationship between OCS
activities and MPAs.
|
 |
Given the shifting emphasis in contaminant risk assessment from body
burden effects and the difficulties of interpreting body burden data, MMS
in future studies should emphasize an effects based approach (such as
P-450 induction or other biomarkers).
|
 |
Possible oil and gas development off the Canadian west coast near the
U.S. boundary suggests the need for an MMS Pacific OCS Region liaison to
U.S. and Canadian marine researchers in that area. |
Subcommittee Actions
The subcommittee on mercury was dissolved after members were praised
for their outstanding work on the recent mercury issue.
Memberships on existing subcommittees were reassigned as follows:
 |
Deepwater Subcommittee – Drs. James Coleman, Michael Rex,
William Schroeder, and Joe Smith
|
 |
Beaufort Sea Monitoring Issues Subcommittee – Drs. Michael
Castellini, Scott Goldsmith, William Schroeder, and Lynda Shapiro
|
 |
Sand and Gravel Subcommittee – Drs. James Coleman, Duane
Gill, Robert Diaz, Charles Marek, and Livingston Marshall |
New subcommittees were formed in three areas to deal proactively with
emerging issues and provide specialized assistance to the Gulf of Mexico
OCS Region:
 |
Chemical Contaminants – Drs. Mary Scranton, Denise
Stephenson-Hawk, Joe Smith, and John Trefry
|
 |
Decommissioning Subcommittee
– Drs. Richard Hildreth, Michael
Kosro, Livingston Marshall, and Mary Scranton
|
 |
Gulf of Mexico/Economic Workshop – Drs. Duane Gill, Scott
Goldsmith, Richard Hildreth, and Edella Schlager. |
|