Topic Indices and Site Maps Search - Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement Home - Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
 
 
Offshore Crane Safety
National Safety Alert
2001 Update
1999 Update
Open Forum-Q&A's
Original Report
2001 Workshop-Q&A's
Offshore Safety
NTL No. 2000-N04
Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Homepage
5-Year OCS Leasing Program
Environmental Stewardship
ECON
GOMESA Revenue Sharing
International Activities
Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP)
Jobs
Leasing
Mapping and Data
Leasing Moratorium Information
Offshore Safety
Offshore Stats & Facts
Operations
Past 5-Year Programs
Penalties
Regulatory Compliance
Renewable Energy Program
Research
Resource Evaluation
2006 National Assssment
2006 National Assessment Map
Contact Us
Navy Spacer
Alaska Region
Atlantic
Gulf of Mexico
Pacific Region
Navy Spacer
 
 Hot Topics:

   NEW Reforms


   Ocean Energy
   Safety Advisory
   Committee

   Notice to Lessees

   Well Permits and
   Plans

   Investigations and
   Review Unit

   Deepwater Horizon
   Library & Reading
   Room

 

Navy Spacer
 
 Contact:
    OEMM Web Team

 
Navy Spacer
 

Crane Inspections

The Bureau National PINC List and Guidelines Book utilized by the offshore inspectors contain 20 specific crane PINC’s. These PINC’s and Guidelines were created by Bureau, and more specifically by the National PINC Review Team. These PINC’s conform with the requirements found in 30 CFR 250.120(c) and Third Edition of API RP 2D.

The workgroup conducted a query of the TIMS database to see how many Incidents of Noncompliance (INC) were issued from January, 1995 through August, 1998. The results of this query shows that a total of 165 crane related INC’s were issued during this time period. As Attachment 2 illustrates, only 12 of the 20 available PINC’s were cited. The most frequently cited PINC was PINC G-201, which is primarily a records PINC. In fact, with the exception of PINC G-204, all of the recorded crane INC’s listed in Attachment 2 are associated with record keeping. This is not an unusual finding. With the variety of safety inspections expected to be performed in a very limited time, record checks on cranes are not only considered a legitimate type of inspection, but sometimes the only means of inspection. Aside from obvious deficiencies that may be found during a physical inspection of a crane, the Bureau Inspectors must rely on the integrity of the operator and the accuracy of their required paperwork associated with qualified crane inspections and personnel training.

Unfortunately, there will probably always be cases where a breakdown of this integrity exists, such as the crane mishap investigated by the Bureau Camarillo District Office around the first part of 1998. After an initial investigation was conducted, several INC’s were issued and subsequently the Pacific Region filed a civil penalty against the operator. This operator had a substantial record of noncompliance over a span of about 18 months. The action initiated by the Camarillo District is still partially under appeal, however, this effort is an ideal example of how an investigation should result in the necessary action to gain attention to ongoing concerns with safety, and more specifically, with safety involving cranes.

Our workgroup was recently informed that during the third week of October, 1998, the the Bureau PINC Review Team will meet to discuss several PINC inspection categories. Because of the increase in incidents involving offshore cranes, the PINC team will include a portion of their agenda to discuss in detail what, if any, recommendations the Bureau should submit to the API committee regarding the revision or improvement of API RP 2D.

Table of Contents

Last Updated: 10/27/2010, 12:36 PM Central Time